← Search

Fernanda Lobo Trindade

MINNEOLA, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 76W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Fernanda Lobo Trindade to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-04-12 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Hechinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3, 0-1
W
2025-06-16 · Stohl · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joyce Monczynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-06-09 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Early
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-05-04 · #1 Doubles · with Richard Laspro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Tricia Rupright / Mark Liu
2025-05-03 · #3 Doubles · with Richard Laspro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Richard Laspro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-27 · #1 Doubles · with Richard Laspro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-04-05 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin OConnor-Sage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-04-04 · Wilbon · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Turhan Wilbon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-03-30 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misty Kaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-03-16 · BUF: Banks/Wilbon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henry Burns mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
80%
12W–3L · 66.9% of games
4.0
69%
29W–13L · 56.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
84.6%
22W–4L · 64.1% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer