← Search

Jan Coleman

Buffalo, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 90W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jan Coleman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Carol Salvatore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Michele McGrath championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · BUF: Top Notch · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Connerton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6
L
2026-07-08 · Western: Judi's Favs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Wingerter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-6
W
2026-06-24 · Western: Judi's Favs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nelida Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · Western: Judi's Favs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Salvatore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · BUF: Top Notch · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele McGrath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · BUF: Top Notch · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samar Al-Alam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-21 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fernanda Lobo Trindade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Hechinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-02-15 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Hechinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-01-24 · Double Shots · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anthony Yates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
73.2%
52W–19L · 60.4% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.9% of games
8.0
90.5%
19W–2L · 67.4% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 38.1% of games
8.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
30 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams