← Search

Alisa Atkins

Wilton, NH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
292 matches · 177W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alisa Atkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history292 matches
L
2026-09-02 · BED:Farrell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Seiko Maruyama championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-06 · BED:Farrell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Vizgaitis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-04 · BED:Farrell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · SFT:Spark:Taylor/Sideman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Taylor Spector
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-07 · BED:Farrell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · BED:Farrell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · SFT:Spark:Taylor/Sideman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassie Burbine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-5
W
2026-06-23 · BED:Farrell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · SFT:Spark:Taylor/Sideman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirsten DeSalvo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · WTC:Winchester:Atkins · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Rielly Malz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · MRC:Harrison · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.7% of games
3.5
69.1%
56W–25L · 60.4% of games
4.0
50.6%
41W–40L · 52.5% of games
4.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.6% of games
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 64% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
48.1%
13W–14L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
60%
18W–12L · 54.5% of games
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
106 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
36 matches
#2 Singles
6%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal