← Search

Jannea Wood

Madison, WI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 56W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jannea Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-09-03 · WI Combo 6.5W MALT Schmidt · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claire Feith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · WI Combo 6.5W MALT Schmidt · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mei Hu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · WI Combo 6.5W MALT Schmidt · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sora Kim
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
Charlotte Laval Dehay / Rachel Yeck
2026-05-14 · WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT Schmidt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with McKenna Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-09 · WI Adult 40&O 3.0W MALT Schmidt · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-26 · WI Adult 40&O 3.0W MALT Schmidt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claire Feith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-19 · WI Adult 40&O 3.0W MALT Schmidt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claire Feith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-12 · WI Adult 40&O 3.0W MALT Schmidt · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-11-25 · WI Low Tri W Doubles (Late Fall) MALT Wegner · #3 Doubles · with Janet Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
36.1%
26W–46L · 43.8% of games
5.5
88.2%
15W–2L · 65.6% of games
6.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 37.5% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.7% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#1 Singles
14%
19 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams