← Search

Suzanne Ruggles

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
347 matches · 185W–162L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Ruggles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history347 matches
W
2026-09-10 · TOC.Barcinas · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catie Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-01 · ACP.Terjesen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Munster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · Ca.Conzola55C6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Reinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · TOC.Barcinas · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Triebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Am.Stevenson40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dora Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · MParker.55C-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maya Ress
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · ACP.Terjesen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Munster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · Ca.Conzola55C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Reinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · Am.Stevenson40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Theresa Rosario-Jansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · MParker.55C-YMCA · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deb Lanier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-04 · ACP.Terjesen · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tobi Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · Ca.Conzola55T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Myra Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
54.6%
83W–69L · 52.8% of games
3.5
37.1%
26W–44L · 44.5% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 52% of games
6.5
58%
51W–37L · 52.5% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
126 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
117 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
96 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe