← Search

Ruth Dobson-Torres

Morrisville, NC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
70 matches · 28W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ruth Dobson-Torres to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-09-03 · PW.Kupfrian · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah van Saun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · PW.West · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Slater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-2
W
2026-08-27 · PW.Kupfrian · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah van Saun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · PW.West · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Luecke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jannifer Frazier / Maria Hernandez
2026-08-11 · PW.West · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Luecke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · PW.Burkey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Hammes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · TOC.Riddick · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · TOC.Hollett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-07 · TOC.Riddick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosanne Facktor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-10 · TOC.Riddick · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Enderline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-09 · TOC.Riddick · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Enderline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-05 · TOC.Hollett · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
37.2%
16W–27L · 46% of games
6.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 41.9% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
13%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova