← Search

Eric Schuman

Buffalo, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 36W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Eric Schuman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · Buffalo Wild · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zach Gluck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
N/A
2026-07-15 · BUF: Wilbon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Shotell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · BUF: Wilbon · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · with William Whisker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Nicholas Davis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with William Whisker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · Buffalo Wild · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sanjeev Relan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · Buffalo Wild · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zach Gluck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · Buffalo Wild · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zach Gluck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-01 · Buffalo Wild · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zach Gluck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
100%
8W–0L · 71% of games
4.5
70%
7W–3L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams