← Search

Mark Witzleben

— year-end
158 matches · 115W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Witzleben to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
W
2026-07-08 · BUF: Scrubs · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Dashkoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · BUF: Scrubs · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerry Freeburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · BUF: Scrubs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerry Freeburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · with Sanjeev Relan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-11-14 · BUF: Quaker Aurora · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sanjeev Relan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-26 · BUF: Quaker Aurora · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sanjeev Relan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Ronald White championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-02 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-07-16 · BUF: Buffalo Heat · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronald White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-06-30 · Scrubs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerry Freeburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-25 · BUF: Buffalo Heat · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronald White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-16 · Scrubs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerry Freeburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
86.7%
26W–4L · 62.9% of games
4.0
81.4%
48W–11L · 61.4% of games
4.5
33.3%
6W–12L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 61.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#1 Singles
6%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova