← Search

Daniel Polhamus

Avon, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
196 matches · 88W–108L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Daniel Polhamus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
L
2026-05-27 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cliff Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-23 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · BSF:Polhamus/Neville · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Neville mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · BSF:Polhamus · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · BSF:Deuces Wild:Polhamus/Turekian · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Battiston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · BSF:Polhamus/Turekian · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Finch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · BSF:Polhamus/Neville · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Neville mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cliff Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6
L
2026-04-10 · BSF:Polhamus/Neville · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Crofts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-04 · BSF:Polhamus · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawid Stasiowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · BSF:Polhamus · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Trudeau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
58%
47W–34L · 53.5% of games
4.0
20.6%
7W–27L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
48.2%
27W–29L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
28%
7W–18L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
50 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer