← Search

Jean Olson

Omaha, NE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 27W–32L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Jean Olson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2025-04-27 · Kephart/Hass · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Garfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-04-13 · Kephart/Hass · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Spahr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-30 · Kephart/Hass · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Garfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-03-23 · Kephart/Hass · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Kozal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-21 · Tracy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Garth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-14 · Tracy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Garth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-07 · Tracy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Korsos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-07-15 · Tong/Hartin · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alexander Adkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2022-06-24 · Tong/Hartin · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alexander Adkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2022-06-15 · Grabowski · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-05-20 · Tong/Hartin · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sharath Kasireddy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2022-05-18 · Grabowski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 61.9% of games
3.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 44.5% of games
6.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 41.2% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal