← Search

Ellen Schmidt

Omaha, NE
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 8W–15L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Ellen Schmidt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2024-06-24 · Friedman · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-17 · Friedman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Kozal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-03 · Friedman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Riggert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2024-04-29 · Friedman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darlene Reinsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-06-29 · Grabowski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeri James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-05-18 · Grabowski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-05-04 · Grabowski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Callista Sibilia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2021-04-18 · Grabowski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noreen Grabowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2021-03-28 · Grabowski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2021-03-21 · Grabowski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Vair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2020-08-13 · Gay · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with CHRISTINA PADGETT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2020-07-18 · Gay · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with CHRISTINA PADGETT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.7% of games
3.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#2 Singles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert