← Search

Soma Mukherjee

— year-end
42 matches · 28W–14L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Soma Mukherjee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-09-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Analida Alexay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-03 · Hagood7.5/META · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Beth Shults-kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-14 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-07 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-31 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Chelsea Aiken
2026-03-29 · Mukherjee/META · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-22 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Wallingford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Susan Taylor / Liz Guillemette
2025-10-05 · Blackthorn/META · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacie Torbett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-09-29 · Blackthorn/META · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Caveney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-10 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 68.6% of games
4.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 49.2% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#1 Singles
33%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert