← Search

Analida Alexay

JOHNSON CITY, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 82W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Analida Alexay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Hagood7.5/META · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Soma Mukherjee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-03 · Hagood7.5/META · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holli Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Clemons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Liu4.0/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Simon Temperton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
Taihi Egres / Cole Creighton
2026-06-16 · Liu4.0/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daryl Addison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
Barbara Miller / Janet Mitchell
2026-04-25 · Zhang55/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-07 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Connie Simcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-02 · Zhang55/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alice Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-31 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Connie Simcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-29 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Guillemette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 53% of games
4.0
44.9%
22W–27L · 46% of games
7.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 50.5% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.4% of games
4.0mixed
27.8%
5W–13L · 38.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer