← Search

Thomas Milici

YOUNGSVILLE, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 72W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Thomas Milici to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-03-25 · Je.Miller55A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Roney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-03-25 · Pa.Shimp40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Doug Kobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-23 · Ja.Copan55A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Shuman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-18 · Pa.Shimp40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with CHUCK VITELLO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-17 · Je.Miller55A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Hulicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-10 · Je.Miller55A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-04 · Pa.Shimp40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peter Salmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-03 · Je.Miller55A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-02 · Ja.Copan55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-25 · Pa.Shimp40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steven Rodier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-09-24 · Je.Miller55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-03 · Je.Miller55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams79 teams · 2017–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
62.9%
39W–23L · 53.2% of games
3.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 40.6% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
52%
13W–12L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams