← Search

David Testa

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 22W–25L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add David Testa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
Joseph Smith / Robert Caulfield
2026-09-01 · Be.Barnhill55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gerard Auvergne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-26 · Be.Barnhill40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Parsons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · Da.McNulty40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-30 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-21 · Mi.Ratliff18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Francisco Burbano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Mi.Ratliff18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-09 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Francisco Burbano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Mi.Ratliff18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Fitzsimmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · Mi.Ratliff18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
42.1%
16W–22L · 47.2% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#1 Singles
17%
8 matches
#2 Singles
17%
8 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King