← Search

Quinn Epperly

— year-end
35 matches · 31W–4L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Quinn Epperly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-08-15 · Osborne/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jake Abernathy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Epperly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
James Montgomery / Tabitha McElrath
2026-07-10 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deanna Unger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with MARISA GRAHAM mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Epperly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timmy Ramirez Cuesta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Preston Johns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Stephan Scappaticci / Andrew Spears
2026-01-17 · Parks/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-10 · Parks/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nat Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-12-07 · Gosselin/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2025-07-13 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abigail Osborne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 75% of games
3.5
100%
7W–0L · 75.7% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.9% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 73.3% of games
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 79% of games
4.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert