Amelie Vanier
Fairfield, CT
191 matches · 88W–103L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Amelie Vanier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history191 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
Andrea Frickman / Jennifer Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2027
CP:I'd Hit That:Hager
FIT:Queens of the Court:Roper/Genser
MIT:Dream Team:Nava/Nolan
NHH: Play it forward: Sookvaree
TCT:Mixed Double Shots:Swan/Nelson
Amelie Vanier
CP: I'd Hit That: Hager
CP:I'd Hit That:Hager
MIT:Give Me a Break:Nava/Nolan
MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig
NHH: Play It Forward: Sookvaree
NHH:Play It Forward:Sookvaree/Stasko
TCT: 3.5 Racquettes Spring 40: Buschauer
TCT:3.5 Racquettes:Buschauer
TCT:Mixed Double Shots:Nelson/Swan
TCT:Tri 3.5:Franchini
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50.7%
38W–37L · 53.1% of games
4.0
39.2%
31W–48L · 44.3% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 41.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
33 matches
#2 Singles
14%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
20 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.