← Search

Marielise Watts

— year-end
91 matches · 42W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marielise Watts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
W
Victoria Shobe / Kim Kaplan
2026-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Ellison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · CRRC Early Birds 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Lowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
Jennifer Geraghty / Lauren Mastoloni
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-02 · CRRC Early Birds 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Lowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-31 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Lowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · County Tennis Club -18+ 3.5 -County Court Crushers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · CRRC Early Birds 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Lowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 56.1% of games
3.5
43.3%
26W–34L · 46.3% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert