← Search

Seth Walker

— year-end
41 matches · 26W–15L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Seth Walker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
Parker Thieneman / Christian Lopez
2022-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Zumbrun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Abdul Nazif
2022-07-27 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Zumbrun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-06-01 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Nikhil Kulkarni / Parker Thieneman
2022-02-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Neal Abdullah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
David Chader / Andrew Leonard
2022-01-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Zumbrun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-01-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephen Glaholt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
Jeff Akers / Robert Bennett
2021-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Criswell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2021-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Criswell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Joel Ashman / Jordan Ashton
2021-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Criswell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2021-07-17 · CIN Indianapolis Tri -Level Piekarsky · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colton Butcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
9-8
L
2021-07-17 · CIN Indianapolis Tri -Level Piekarsky · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colton Butcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-8
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 61.4% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 30.3% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams