← Search

David Chader

Trafalgar, IN
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
273 matches · 225W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Chader to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history273 matches
W
2026-08-21 · Indy X18 9.0 MRC Cooper · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Courtney Rich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 9.0 MRC Cooper · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anna Koval mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · Indy X18 9.0 MRC Cooper · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Courtney Rich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-24 · Indy X18 9.0 MRC Cooper · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-17 · Indy X18 9.0 MRC Cooper · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Adrienne Searcy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
Jason Denton / Kyle Johnson
2026-07-14 · IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0M · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kent Whitener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-10 · Indy X18 9.0 MRC Cooper · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Adrienne Searcy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0M · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Marius Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-23 · IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0M · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tom Ciszewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · Indy X18 9.0 MRC Cooper · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anna Koval mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0M · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Joshua Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0M · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Christian Settles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
77.8%
35W–10L · 64% of games
5.0
75%
21W–7L · 58.3% of games
8.5
87.3%
55W–8L · 65.3% of games
10.0mixed
68%
17W–8L · 55.5% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
83.3%
15W–3L · 65.9% of games
9.0mixed
85.7%
72W–12L · 65.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
171 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams