← Search

Diane Hammond

Hattiesburg, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 32W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Diane Hammond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-06-29 · Kolbo Mixed 40+ 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joe Bishop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · Kolbo 2026 55+ 3.0 MIXED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joe Bishop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-8
W
2026-04-27 · 2026 3.0 HCC 40+W (PB) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kerri Chain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-2
W
2026-04-14 · 2026 3.0 HCC 40+W (PB) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Toups
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-09 · Hammond/Lamar County Tennis/PB · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Che Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
Jennifer Bishop / Carol Pittman
2026-04-07 · Hammond/Lamar County Tennis/PB · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Che Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Susan Thomas / Misty White
2026-03-26 · Hammond/Lamar County Tennis/PB · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christi Dyess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-16 · Vance 5.5 Combo 40+ · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashley Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-09 · Vance 5.5 Combo 40+ · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashley Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-10-01 · Coaker 55+ 6.5 combo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janie Gilmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-09-29 · Vance 5.5 Combo 40+ · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lindsay Glover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-09-17 · Coaker 55+ 6.5 combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janie Gilmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 54.2% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 45.4% of games
5.5
75%
9W–3L · 64.9% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 47% of games
3.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer