← Search

Beth Kostelnick

Columbus, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 86W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Kostelnick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Glanz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Parker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
Joni Mitchell Ross / MacKenzie Skellan
2026-06-04 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janine Kiser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-18 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janine Kiser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-27 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janine Kiser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Belinda Hildebrandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-17 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary McGuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lexi Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-29 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Belinda Hildebrandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary McGuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-02 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Ware
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Belinda Hildebrandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
71.9%
23W–9L · 59.7% of games
3.5
72%
54W–21L · 58.8% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
9W–3L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
25 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova