← Search

Belinda Hildebrandt

Columbus, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 128W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Belinda Hildebrandt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
W
2026-05-02 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denisa Hiles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-19 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Kostelnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Kaiya Minier
2026-04-10 · Racquet Club 2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-29 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Kostelnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-13 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-03-08 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Mihalich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-06 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-03-01 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Kostelnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-27 · Racquet Club 2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 69.5% of games
3.5
70.3%
109W–46L · 58.6% of games
4.0
35%
7W–13L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
32 matches
#2 Singles
15%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal