← Search

Tina Fulcher

— year-end
113 matches · 77W–36L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Tina Fulcher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Watson, Lee Anne · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lee Anne Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · Woodruff, Elissa · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelley White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-30 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brandi Hyatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-23 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Tesseneer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · Taylor, Alyssa · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hayley Lohrisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-26 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Tesseneer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
Ashley Smith / Catherine Stoltzfus
2026-05-19 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beth Noland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Robbie Ellard / Nancy Thompson
2026-05-12 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Ruhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-11 · Taylor, Alyssa · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Tesseneer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-05 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beth Noland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-23 · Ruhl, Allison · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-16 · Ruhl, Allison · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.7% of games
3.0
80%
36W–9L · 61.2% of games
3.5
45%
9W–11L · 52.6% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.4% of games
6.5
60%
15W–10L · 54.4% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Singles
12%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer