← Search

Linda Peters

— year-end
262 matches · 153W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Peters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history262 matches
L
2026-08-22 · Smash and Dash · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elaine Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-16 · Smash and Dash · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Louise Bowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-01 · Smash and Dash · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Louise Bowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Smash and Dash · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maia Knowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · Match Wiser · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jenny Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · Match Wiser · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arundhati Pant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · The Rat Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Tomasello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · The Rat Pack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Tomasello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · The Rat Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Tomasello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-15 · The Rat Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Tomasello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · The Rat Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Tomasello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-23 · Aches & Pains · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Test
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Teams26 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 62.5% of games
3.5
70.6%
89W–37L · 59.2% of games
4.0
39.5%
15W–23L · 43.8% of games
7.0
66.7%
18W–9L · 58.4% of games
8.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
35.1%
13W–24L · 42.5% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
110 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
100 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
45 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer