← Search

Kim Morris

— year-end
249 matches · 164W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Morris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history249 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Gozdan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Badami
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Ali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Gozdan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Gozdan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Gozdan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-19 · UD Smash Squad · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlene McGrew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
W
2026-06-16 · Legacy Spring 40+ · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Sassoli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-09 · Legacy Spring 40+ · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Sassoli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shin-Yi Chou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-02 · Legacy Spring 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · UD Smash Squad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlene McGrew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 59.2% of games
3.0
86.2%
50W–8L · 65.4% of games
3.5
81.7%
58W–13L · 62.9% of games
4.0
44.6%
50W–62L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
58 matches
#1 Singles
14%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
18 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams