← Search

Julie Redick

— year-end
80 matches · 38W–42L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Julie Redick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-09-01 · HOCO Jackson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · HOCO Jackson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Traci Ludicke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · HOCO-BENDALL · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacy Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-8
L
2026-08-16 · HOCO-BENDALL · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chrystal Wasden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-8
L
2026-08-10 · RS-JOINER · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vanessa Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · RS-JOINER · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vanessa Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · RS-JOINER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandra Rubanov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · RS-JOINER · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vanessa Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-06 · RS-JOINER · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joanna Roller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · RS-JOINER · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joanna Roller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · RS-JOINER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandra Rubanov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-25 · RN Bloodworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Rubanov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams54 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 45.2% of games
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.3% of games
4.0
45.6%
26W–31L · 48.8% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.9% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert