← Search

Brenda Warrick

GEORGETOWN, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 50W–60L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brenda Warrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
W
Diana Coggin / Christopher Davis
2026-08-29 · Berry Next Point 6.0 55 Mixed · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Geisler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · Berry Next Point · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Polk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-08-08 · Berry Next Point 6.0 55 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jaime Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-02 · Berry Next Point · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Polk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · Berry Next Point 6.0 55 Mixed · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charles Harrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-12 · Berry Next Point · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Polk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Berry Next Point · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jaime Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-18 · No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-21 · No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · You can't sip with us · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leo Guzman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · Racq Pacq 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
69.2%
27W–12L · 57.6% of games
3.5
30.5%
18W–41L · 42.2% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert