← Search

Jana McCown

Georgetown, TX
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 25W–45L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jana McCown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Sun Risers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Cabellos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-06 · Berry Next Point · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-12 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · Battle Cats · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-29 · Over Served · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlin Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-22 · Over Served · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlin Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · Battle Cats · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · Battle Cats · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · Over Served · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · Battle Cats · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Scharf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · Berry Crushers · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Conni Thoms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-22 · Berry Next Point · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
36.2%
21W–37L · 45.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 40.4% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 23% of the time
#2 Singles
23%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#1 Singles
19%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova