← Search

Itala Ream

Weston, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 87W–57L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Itala Ream to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
L
2026-05-15 · Wrc/Navas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jorge Quintero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-01 · Wrc/Navas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jorge Quintero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-26 · Wrc/Ream · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melisa Bayter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · Wrc/Ream · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Solano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-10 · Wrc/Ream · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lory Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-03 · Wrc/Ream · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lory Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-26 · Wrc/Ream · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lory Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-10 · Wrc/Ream · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lory Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-03 · Wrc/Ream · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lidia Luz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-27 · Wrc/Ream · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaime Krohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-20 · Wrc/Ream · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lory Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-15 · Wrc/Ream · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lory Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
70%
49W–21L · 58% of games
4.0
40%
10W–15L · 47.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 56.9% of games
7.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 44.3% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer