← Search

Tiffany Smith

— year-end
139 matches · 91W–48L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Tiffany Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-08-22 · KY/LOU/JORDAN/ MOORE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Dailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-15 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · KY/LOU/JORDAN/ MOORE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lawanda Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · KY/LOU/OConnell/Voss · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felicia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with GENELLE COCHRAN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · KY/LOU/MOORE/SHIVELY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Ozier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · KY/LOU/OConnell/Voss · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Stofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · KY/LOU/MOORE/SHIVELY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Ozier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · KY/LOU/MOORE/SHIVELY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-23 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-17 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Teams85 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
67.8%
59W–28L · 56.2% of games
4.5
60%
9W–6L · 51.6% of games
7.5
88.2%
15W–2L · 62.7% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.1% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.6% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams