← Search

Felicia Smith

Louisville, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 129W–46L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Felicia Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
L
2026-08-30 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melody Medley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Danielle Jones / Anne Grove
2026-08-09 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-08 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melody Medley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
L
2026-08-06 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Troy Fontana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-03 · KY/LOU/OConnell/Voss · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Stanchin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josiah Wall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-24 · Bruneau/Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sean Bolen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-18 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maureen Fulton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · KY/LOU/OConnell/Voss · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Shapira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Mishloney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-11 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josiah Wall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams88 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
85.3%
29W–5L · 64.4% of games
4.0
74.6%
50W–17L · 59.9% of games
4.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 51.4% of games
7.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 63.3% of games
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.9% of games
3.5mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 67.1% of games
4.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.4% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova