← Search

James Pruce

Chagrin Falls, OH
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 58W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Pruce to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
L
2026-07-16 · A18 4.0M 4 WE Elefter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Laidler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · A40 4.0M WE Frankfort · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Piletz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · A40 4.0M WE Frankfort · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Unger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · A40 4.0M WE Frankfort · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with VLAD VOLKOV
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · A40 4.0M WE Frankfort · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with VLAD VOLKOV
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · A40 4.0M WE Frankfort · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris McClure
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · A18 4.0M 4 WE Elefter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonny Kwon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-20 · A40 4.0M WE Frankfort · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Weiskind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · A18 4.0M WE2 Frankfort · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karl Burtnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-10 · A18 4.0M WE2 Frankfort · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brennan Igoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · Low Tri M WE Woodruff · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martin Laidler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-06 · A18 4.0M WE2 Frankfort · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Niehenke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.6% of games
3.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 64% of games
4.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 45.6% of games
6.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 60.8% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 63.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova