← Search

Eric Mock

Willoughby, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 114W–100L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Mock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history214 matches
L
David Terbeek / Jacob Terbeek
2026-07-16 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Davood Dadfar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · A40 4.0M MV2 Smith · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Mercuri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Stimac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-02 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with GAUTAM PATHAK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · A40 4.0M MV2 Smith · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jinu Hwang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · X18 8.0 MV Sterkenburg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolann Sterkenburg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Stimac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · X18 8.0 MV Sterkenburg · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Zalba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-09 · A40 4.0M MV2 Smith · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andre Guzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Markel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-02 · A40 4.0M MV2 Smith · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gerald King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Stephans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
67.9%
72W–34L · 56% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 42.6% of games
7.5
42.4%
14W–19L · 46.6% of games
8.5
35.7%
10W–18L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 48.1% of games
8.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.4% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
52 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer