← Search

Kate Perez

— year-end
136 matches · 80W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kate Perez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
L
2026-02-08 · Zittle/Siddle (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Hughes-Vazquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-07 · Zittel/Siddle (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Siddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-18 · Siddle/Perez (FD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-11-16 · Zittel/Siddle (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Sipes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-11-09 · Zittel/Siddle (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Pant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-02 · Zittel/Siddle (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kiya Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-12 · Zittel/Siddle (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Trickey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-09 · Siddle/Perez (FD) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Couture
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-04 · Zittel (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Siddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-04-27 · Zittel (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hope Zittel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-17 · Siddle/Perez (SD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Siddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-04-08 · Siddle/Perez (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kiya Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 58.9% of games
3.5
59.7%
43W–29L · 54.6% of games
4.0
50%
25W–25L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
31 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer