← Search

Molly Dubberke

— year-end
207 matches · 111W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Molly Dubberke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history207 matches
W
2026-07-02 · Kellogg/Grassle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Clipp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-04 · Kellogg/Grassle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-02-08 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Inman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-07 · Hoxsey (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-16 · Hoxsey (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Breer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-11 · Conway/Hepfinger (FD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-10-28 · Conway/Hepfinger (FD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-10-12 · Hoxsey (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-07 · Conway/Hepfinger (FD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Briana Hepfinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-10-05 · Hoxsey (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Hoxsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams42 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
49.2%
32W–33L · 50.9% of games
4.0
55.4%
72W–58L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
58 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams