Sharon Farber
152 matches · 93W–59L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Sharon Farber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history152 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
(A) BTC:Net Ninjas:Griffith
BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman/Cosgrove
BTC:Slice Girls:Mabe/Farber
(Q) BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman
(Q) BTC:Summer Slice Girls:Farber/Mabe
BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman/Cosgrove
BTC:Couples Therapy:Farber
BTC:Net Ninjas:Griffith/
BTC:Slice Girls:Farber/Mabe
BTC:The People's Court:Griffith/
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
67.1%
55W–27L · 57.9% of games
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 54.3% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
30W–24L · 51.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
43 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.