← Search

Brenna McAllister

Hartford, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 44W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Brenna McAllister to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-07-06 · (Q) BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Huttner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · (Q) BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Farber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · (Q) BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-25 · BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman/Cosgrove · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Gaidos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-24 · BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Datsko/Mills · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colin Schlank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Datsko/Mills · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colin Schlank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-02-28 · BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman/Cosgrove · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-6
W
2026-02-21 · BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman/Cosgrove · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Datsko/Mills · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colin Schlank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-24 · BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman/Cosgrove · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-12-20 · BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman/Cosgrove · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-6
L
2025-11-22 · BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman/Cosgrove · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Farber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 61.6% of games
3.5
54.5%
18W–15L · 55.2% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 46% of the time
#1 Singles
46%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King