← Search

Liz Herr

— year-end
114 matches · 72W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Liz Herr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Francesca Loricco championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Alianiello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
L
2026-07-13 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Haven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-11 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mondel Teka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Riether-Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Driscoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-4
L
2026-06-04 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mondel Teka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · MIT:4.5 W 40+: Umbricht/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Emerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-03-05 · MIT:BB's Winter:DeAngelis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Driscoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-6
L
2026-03-01 · MIT:4.5 W 40+: Umbricht/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Emerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
82.1%
32W–7L · 65.9% of games
4.0
59.6%
31W–21L · 55% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
24 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams