← Search

Amanda Newquist

WATKINSVILLE, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 10W–12L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Amanda Newquist to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
W
2026-09-09 · ACC/Coulter-Morgan · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Maxey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-02 · ACC/Coulter-Morgan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-25 · ACC/Cunningham · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Maxey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · ACC/McCallen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shana Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-13 · ACC/McCallen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Loftis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 6-7
W
Kathy LaPointe / Ashley Smith
2026-02-06 · ACC/Cunningham · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Kasey Dillard / Ashley Smith
2026-02-05 · ACC/Cunningham · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ginger Hriczo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-01-24 · ACC/McCallen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Olliff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-22 · ACC/Coulter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-01 · ACC/Coulter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-09-24 · ACC/Coulter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-09-10 · ACC/Coulter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amye Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 53.1% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
13 matches
#1 Singles
14%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe