← Search

Emily Bahnsen

Athens, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 25W–15L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Emily Bahnsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-09-09 · ATC/Gattiker Wednesday · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-02 · ATC/Gattiker Wednesday · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Gattiker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-02 · ATC/Nelson 6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Kate Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · COTA/Jen Cole · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Derrick Bahnsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · ATC/Nelson 6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · COTA/Jen Cole · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Kulik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · ATC/Nelson 6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Bond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · COTA/Jen Cole · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Derrick Bahnsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · ATC/Nelson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-24 · ATC/Nelson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Poske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 6-2
L
2026-02-14 · ATC/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Poske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-12 · ATC/Nelson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 55.1% of games
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.5% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.6% of games
5.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
14 matches
#1 Singles
13%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer