← Search

De Dawkins

Nashville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 24W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add De Dawkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-05-17 · Swann/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Galloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · Swann/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Irby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Swann/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Galloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-05-03 · Whitley/Galloway/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Galloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-29 · Whitley/Galloway/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Feyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-27 · Minter/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rod Baine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-04-19 · Whitley/Galloway/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Feyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-04-12 · Whitley/Galloway/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Barbey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-04-06 · Minter/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Galloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-04-05 · Whitley/Galloway/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Feyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-11-16 · Brown/Galloway/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-11-09 · Brown/Galloway/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Galloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 67.7% of games
4.0
70%
14W–6L · 53.2% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer