← Search

Jason Snap

NASHVILLE, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 45W–22L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jason Snap to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-08-08 · Faldetta/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrew Kantor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-26 · Hunter/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Snap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · Curran/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Curran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Snap/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Grout mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · Curran/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Faldetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Jan Phanthalangsy / David Goodwin
2026-06-27 · Snap/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Snap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
Shannon Smith / Christopher Oubre
2026-06-26 · Snap/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edith Kirkland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · Curran/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · Curran/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · Snap/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Snap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · Piovarcy/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Reeve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
James Almand / Chris Brown
2026-05-02 · DeMouy/Piovarcy/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
72.5%
29W–11L · 56.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.5% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 53.8% of games
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams