← Search

Amanda Palmer

Columbia, SC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 26W–78L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amanda Palmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-08-31 · CTL40/Grabowski/WWD · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Nikia Bristow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-24 · CTL40/Grabowski/WWD · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Helen Conroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · CTL40/Grabowski/WWD · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Laura Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
Tracy Corson / Barbara Kelly
2026-08-03 · CTL40/Grabowski/WWD · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Helen Conroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · CTL40/Grabowski/WWD · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Nikia Bristow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · CTL18/Kupfer/PK · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kayla Antosz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · CTL18/Kupfer/PK · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kim Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · CTL18/Kupfer/PK · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kayla Antosz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-15 · CTL18/Woodard/WWD · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meghan Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-08 · CTL18/Woodard/WWD · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Barbara Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-27 · CTL18/Palmer/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Woodard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-13 · CTL18/Palmer/SVCC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
50%
11W–11L · 53.7% of games
3.0
12.1%
8W–58L · 32.9% of games
5.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert