← Search

Diem Pham

Oklahoma City, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 64W–101L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Diem Pham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Racquet Rebels · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Lunsford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Lisa Nguyen / Kelly Johnson
2026-06-16 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-08 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Jarrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-01 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Rex
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-15 · Swirls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-07 · Swirls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-04 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandi English
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-23 · Swirls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Rex
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-10 · Swirls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 58.3% of games
3.0
55.4%
31W–25L · 52.6% of games
3.5
19.7%
12W–49L · 39.5% of games
6.0
43.8%
14W–18L · 44.2% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert