← Search

Marcy Jarrett

— year-end
142 matches · 73W–69L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Marcy Jarrett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Corey Jager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-22 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-18 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Noyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nev Natalie von Hahmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-08 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diem Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-01 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-28 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Noyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Noyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nev Natalie von Hahmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-04-30 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mari Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · Racquet Rebels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tonya Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
61.5%
32W–20L · 56.9% of games
3.5
39.3%
24W–37L · 47.2% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 54.3% of games
7.0
50%
10W–10L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#1 Singles
7%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer