← Search

Angie Gleason

Topeka, KS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 55W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Angie Gleason to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
2026-02-15 · KS/Rinehart/55&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Rinehart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Mark Hopkins / Kareem Thomas
2026-02-12 · KS/Seitz/40&OverMixed7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Augie Meier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-22 · KS/Seitz/40&OverMixed7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juan C Ramirez-Mares mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-11-22 · KS/Rinehart/55&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Rinehart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-4
L
2025-11-03 · Seitz · #3 Mixed Doubles · 7.0 · with Carter Cool mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-28 · Double Shots · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cathy Rinehart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-28 · Double Shots · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsey McClung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-27 · KS/Eccles/55&Over7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Steppe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-09-27 · KS/Eccles/55&Over7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Steppe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-09-11 · Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Rinehart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-15 · Klausman/Lane-Topeka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jami Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-02-22 · Klausman/Lane-Topeka · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey McClung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 45.2% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
51.3%
20W–19L · 50.7% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 56% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
76.9%
20W–6L · 60.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams