← Search

Elias Pimentel

Topeka, KS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 23W–86L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Elias Pimentel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-06-28 · Eccles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shon Daniels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · Eccles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Don Eccles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-21 · Eccles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Don Eccles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Eccles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Don Eccles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-08 · Eccles-Topeka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Don Eccles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · Eccles-Topeka · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shon Daniels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-12 · Eccles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan Bergquist mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-24 · Kenney · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Bonebrake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-22 · Eccles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan Bergquist mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-01-19 · Kenney · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Bonebrake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-17 · Kenney · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Knudtson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-11 · Kenney · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Knudtson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 21% of games
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.1% of games
3.5
5.7%
2W–33L · 34.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 18.2% of games
7.0
41.7%
10W–14L · 45.3% of games
6.0mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 30.1% of games
7.0mixed
7.7%
1W–12L · 30.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert