← Search

Steve Amburn

— year-end
51 matches · 33W–18L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steve Amburn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-05-02 · OK/Amburn/Tulsa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-30 · OK/Amburn/Tulsa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-29 · OK/Langwell/65&over 6.0M · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tom Langwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-03-08 · OK/Langwell/65&over 6.0M · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larry Stalcup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-03-05 · OK/Langwell/65&over 6.0M · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tom Langwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2024-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Lydy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2024-06-02 · Tulsa: Langwell/LF · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Cowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-06-01 · Tulsa: Langwell/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Lydy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Robert Jones / Paul Noyes
2024-05-30 · Tulsa: Langwell/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Lydy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-05-19 · Tulsa: Langwell/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Lydy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-04-27 · OK/ALL TENNIS/Langwell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Cowell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.3% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 59.3% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal