← Search

Laura Kennoy

— year-end
155 matches · 90W–65L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Laura Kennoy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
W
2026-09-11 · KY/LEX/SENTERS · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Albrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-09-10 · KY/LEX/CASTLE/SENTERS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ann Hays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-09 · KY/LEX/SENTERS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lee Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-31 · KY/LEX/CASTLE/SENTERS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Combs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-23 · KY/LEX/CASTLE/SENTERS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · KY/LEX/Castle · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Brunner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-14 · KY/LEX/SENTERS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kandi Waddles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · KY/LEX/SENTERS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dana Hume
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-24 · KY/LEX/KENNOY-LUTZKE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Money mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · KY/LEX/KENNOY-LUTZKE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Morris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · KY/LEX/Walker/Albrecht · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Hume
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-16 · KY/LEX/KENNOY-MARTIN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 64.9% of games
3.5
56.9%
37W–28L · 53.8% of games
4.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 44.4% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 62.5% of games
7.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.4% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
38 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer